Home Health Why Experts and other People Do Not Trust the World Health Organization...

Why Experts and other People Do Not Trust the World Health Organization (WHO)

405
0

Despite experts, scientists and doctors, claiming that the lockdown and “stay at home” policy cannot be justified by the coronavirus impact, meaning that it isn’t as serious as what the World Health Organization (WHO) and other “official” institutions claim, authorities and politicians around the world are still being misled and not given the information regarding this fact. Aside from preventing these experts from speaking to the wider public through blocking them from mainstream media outlets, they are also being aggressively censored, de-platformed and worst, demonized. Not only that, leaders and citizens are also being pressured to keep the lockdown policy even though it is now obviously negatively affecting the economy and thus, threatening the lives of the people by leading to possible agricultural collapse.  

Advertisement

For example, just a week ago, 600 doctors wrote a letter to the president of the United States, Donald Trump, suggesting that the US government should now re-open the economy so that hospitals can operate fully to save the lives of millions of patients that are currently being forsaken and deprived of their rights to be properly treated and therefore, avoid mass casualties. In addition, thousands of small business owners also participated on protests across Europe and the US calling for the end of lockdown to avoid further economic damage and start recovering. Even from the beginning of the month of March, several experts already forewarned officials of the world of this seemingly inconsiderate measure to respond to the situation. According to some, the measures being imposed to people almost all over the world resemble “draconian-like” policies that can be compared to the 1930’s Nazi reign.

Just recently, the WHO, supported by the UK government, has announced a more intrusive approach in dealing with this still almost unproven fear of “dangerous” infection. In one of his speeches, representative Dr. Michael Ryan stated:

“Right now we don’t have an alternative to what we would have considered in the old days bootleather epidemiology; public health practitioners, doctors, nurses, community workers working with communities to detect cases at community level. The most likely person to become a case is someone who’s been a significant contact of another case and at the moment in most parts of the world due to lock-down most of the transmission that’s actually happening in many countries now is happening in the household at family level. In some senses transmission has been taken off the streets and pushed back into family units. Now we need to go and look in families to find those people who may be sick and remove them and isolate them in a safe and dignified manner so that’s what I was saying previously; the transition from movement restrictions and shut-downs and stay-at-home orders can only be made if we have in place the means to be able to detect suspect cases, isolate confirmed cases, track contacts and follow up on the contacts’ health at all times and then isolate any of those people who become sick themselves.”

What worry many people is that this so-called response may mean a long-term separation and isolation even to those who are not sick, including children. In addition, many people who are also against mandatory vaccination and other kinds of big pharma synthetic treatments also fear this might enable for health institutions and governments to administer harmful medicines such as vaccines that contain toxic heavy metals and animal DNA and human genetic samples (from aborted fetuses) that, aside from being unethical, has never been proven to be safe whatsoever.

This concerns seem very important to be considered by governments around the world given that many of these official institutions such as the WHO and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have also been strongly criticized not only for its inconsistencies and mismanagements but also for their proven willing participation to crimes against humanity being spearheaded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and other institutions which have direct ties to notorious pharmaceutical companies administering these vaccines. Decades of records in courts have proven these damages especially in countries like India, Pakistan, and various Asian countries.    

Unbelievable as it sounds, these claims (of their involvement to crimes) have been proven not only by the accusers but also by small institutions, independent and even government-owned. Therefore, it is perfectly valid to say that people’s doubt and distrust on the WHO and CDC are founded on facts and worth the government’s attention and appropriate actions. For example, it is an open secret that the BMGF and other organizations that share with their philosophy of “population control” are funding the WHO millions of dollars to cater to their wishes. In one article from globalresearch.ca, it was written:    

“In 2010, when Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO, he said “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.” And, four years later, in 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.  Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.”

Meanwhile, in an interview just early of this month, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also stated that Bill Gates has also partnered with WHO in the polio vaccination campaign that also resulted to tragedy. He claimed that “half of the WHO’s budget goes towards Gates’ polio vaccine program”. Kennedy then said that ”Gates Foundation’s polio vaccine has caused polio epidemics around the world in places that have not seen polio for decades and said that 70% of polio cases on earth are coming from the Gates vaccine”.

This claim was also supported by a previous article from globalresearch.ca:

“Promising his share of $450 million of $1.2 billion to eradicate polio, Gates took control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), which mandated up to 50 doses (Table 1) of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.”

References:

Featured image: https://thecollegiatelive.com/2020/05/demonstrations-in-opposition-of-whitmers-stay-at-home-order-s-met-by-counter-protesters-in-grand-rapids/